Update from Superintendent Moore

Dear Parents, employees ,
students and community members: Update to school situation! We had provided a generic statement about our school lockdown and closure referring to it as a precautionary security measure. We did so in order that any investigations being conducted by our Sheriff’s department were not compromised by any release of information that we were aware of. Investigations are still ongoing yet I feel I can provide you with some information of which you will see on channel 13 and 5 news reports.
On Wednesday late morning I was informed of a verbal threat meant for our AP at Peakview School. Student was disciplined according to District procedures and policies. Later we learned of a robbery at the Ap’s home in which 2 handguns were stolen. Knowing that these weapons had not been found or any suspect caught, I made the decision to close school for Thursday. Later Wednesday evening I got a report that another Peakview faculty members home had been robbed and 2 more firearms stolen. The latest update is that 2 of the 4 stolen firearms have been returned and investigations are still occurring.
I will provide an update about school on Monday as I get more information hopefully to come to my attention soon.
Thank you for your patience and understanding about the importance of not divulging specific information during ongoing investigations.
After just watching 13 news, it was never said that we expected a school shooting. It was stated, after being asked a question about school shootings, that with all the school shootings that have happened in the US and having employee’s weapons stolen, “Who knows? The possibility is always there and that certainly it is off concern considering we have just had employee homes robbed for their weapons”
Superintendent Moore

Amendment 73 Factual Summary for Huerfano Re-1 School District

Amendment 73 Factual Summary for Huerfano Re-1 School District

Printable PDF Here:  Huerfano Re-1 A73 Factual Summary

What is Amendment 73?

Amendment 73 (A73) is the result of the citizen’s ballot initiative #93 , known as Great Schools, Thriving Communities (GSTC). A73 is a statewide school funding initiative that will increase income taxes for 8% of tax filers and for C Corporations, while decreasing property taxes for business property owners, farmers and ranchers. It will:

  • stabilize and increase funding statewide for preschool through twelfth grade (P-12) public education
  • create the Quality Public Education Fund that can only be used for public education, is exempt from the TABOR revenue limit, must be used to supplement General Fund appropriations for P-12 public education, and is adjusted each year for inflation up to 5 percent

How would it impact funding for Huerfano Re-1 School District?

Based on the most recent CDE estimates for 2018-2019, Huerfano Re-1 School District would receive $1.0 million in additional ongoing revenue if the initiative were implemented for the 2018-2019 school year.

2018-2019 Per Pupil Budget Stabilization Factor for Huerfano Re-1 -$828 / 2018-2019 Additional Per Pupil Funding for Huerfano Re-1 with A73 +$1,827

Amendment 73 – Huerfano Re-1 Numbers The A73 estimate is based on current student count and demographics that are subject to change. Funding estimates will be revised when updated data is released.

How is funding stabilized and raised?

A73 is a property tax decrease for nonresidential property owners and it stabilizes the local share of school funding by permanently setting property tax assessment rates. A73 will prevent future reductions to the residential assessment rate (RAR) as currently required by the Gallagher Amendment. It permanently sets the RAR at 7% (currently 7.2%), and decreases and permanently sets the assessment rate at 24% (currently at 29%) for business property owners, farmers and ranchers — for property taxes levied by school districts.
A73 is an income tax increase for 8% of Colorado tax filers with taxable income (income after exemptions and deductions) over $150,000. In addition, A73 increases the state corporate income tax rate by 1.37% for “C” Corporations (does not include LLCs, sole proprietorships and S corporations ). A73 raises $1.6 billion in revenue that is deposited in the Quality Public Education Fund.

How will the revenue be spent?

The initiative allows school districts to make local decisions about the best use of new funds that reflect local community priorities and needs — examples of how funding could be used include programs supporting mental health, safety and security, career and technical education, school maintenance and repair needs, reducing class size, etc.

How are property taxes for other local governments impacted?

A73 cuts property tax assessment rates only for property taxes levied by school districts. Property taxes levied by other local governments are unaffected by A73.

Will the drop in property tax rates hurt school funding?

No. Setting the residential assessment rate at 7.0% and the nonresidential assessment rate at 24% for mills levied by school districts, the measure decreases local property tax revenue to fund P-12 public schools in FY2019-2020. However, under the School Finance Act, each district’s local share is calculated first, and state aid makes up the difference between the local portion and the total funding need identified through the formula.

What percentage of tax filers will be impacted in Huerfano county and by how much?

The income tax change will impact tax filers with taxable income over $150,000. Income of $180,000 is estimated to equate to $150,000 in taxable income (income after deductions and exemptions). According to the US Census Bureau data, Huerfano county tax filers fit this profile:

  • Average income: $51,580
  • Percent of taxpayers with income between $150,000 and $200,000: 3%
  • Percent of taxpayers with income over $200,000: 3%

The following scenarios provide examples of local Huerfano Re-1 tax filers with various income levels, home values and business properties:

Amendment 73 Tax info for Huerfano Re-1 - how it affects the average tax payer.

*Ranges are used above as property tax savings in relation to the current tax rates vary depending on the language used in school districts’
local mill and bond elections. Visit www.cosfp.org/impactcalculator to utilize the A73 Impact Calculator to input your own scenario.

Arguments For

  • The state needs a sustainable source of revenue to adequately and equitably fund public education.
  • The measure provides property tax relief for business property owners, farmers, and ranchers who have paid an increasingly higher proportion of property taxes
    compared to residential property owners.
  • One of government’s most important functions is to provide children with a high-quality education.
  • Stabilizing the local share of required school formula funding and creating a dedicated source of state revenue for education provide additional flexibility for the state to use more of its general operating budget on other core programs, such as transportation, public safety, and health care.

Arguments Against

  • The measure imposes a tax increase without any guarantee of increased academic achievement.
  • Increasing the state income tax rate could negatively impact the state’s economy. Businesses will have less money to invest in their workers and individuals will have
    less money to spend, save, and invest.
  • The measure complicates an already complicated property tax system. By creating one assessed value for school districts and another assessed value for all other local taxing entities, the measure will lead to confusion among taxpayers and further complicate tax administration for state and local governments.
  • The measure does not allow the state legislature to adjust the income tax thresholds to account for inflation.

Resource documents for additional information: Fiscal Impact Statement for Initiative #93 (Colorado Legislative Council Staff); School Finance in Colorado (Colorado Legislative Council Staff)

Printable PDF Here:  Huerfano Re-1 A73 Factual Summary